Richard Dean Mergenthaler (University of Iowa), Shrivaram Rajgopal (University of Washington), and Suraj Srinivasan (University of Chicago) published CEO and CFO Career Consequences to Missing Quarterly Earnings Benchmarks(June 27, 2008). For those really interested in key executive turnovers and their potential impact the paper is a worthwhile read. A quick abstract of what the authors found is as follows:
… missing quarterly earnings benchmarks, especially the analyst consensus earnings number, is associated with career penalties in the form of a reduced bonus, smaller equity grants, and a greater chance of forced dismissal for both CEOs and CFOs during the period 1993-2004. These results are obtained after controlling for the magnitude of the earnings surprise, operating and stock return performance, and are significant in a statistical and in an economic sense. Career penalties for failing to meet the analyst consensus estimate are higher for firms that give quarterly earnings guidance and in the post-SOX period. Our evidence suggests that (i) boards appear to react directly to managers’ ability to meet earnings targets or to the information that is reflected in meeting such benchmarks; and (ii) senior managers’ preoccupation with meeting earnings benchmarks might be based at least partly on career concerns.
Download the paper and see for yourself.
Recommended Reading – Once an Outsider, Always an Outsider? CEO Origin, Strategic Change and Firm Performance – Rice
January 20, 2010
Recommended Reading – SEC Targets CEO Succession Plans – New Risks for Boards, Says Heidrick & Struggles
October 30, 2009
Recommended Reading – Successful leadership – how would you know? London Business School
February 13, 2009
Recommended Reading – The new fluidity between CFO and COO roles, The Deal.com
July 29, 2009
Recommended Reading – Google’s CFO Search: Why’d it take so long?
June 27, 2008
